MORE: If the Packers' receivers are mid, doesn't that mean Jordan Love and Matt LaFleur rock?

Critics will say the Packers have a bunch of WR2 and WR3s but no WR1s. OK, but they were an elite offense last year. So how did that happen?

Jul 06, 2024

This week, The Leap kicked off its annual ranking of the Green Bay Packers' 90-man roster, covering the long shots, roster hopefuls, and players fighting at the fringes of the 53.

But we have more! The Leap's Peter Bukowski dismantled the argument that the Packers offense, which finished last season fifth in expected points added per play and fourth in EPA per dropback, could possibly have both a middling receiving corps and unspectacular quarterback and offensive play-caller.

Thank you for reading and supporting our coverage. You can also support our work by following us on social media:

Jason B. Hirschhorn: @by_JBH on Twitter / @byjbh@bsky.social on Bluesky / @by_jbh on Threads

Peter Bukowski: @Peter_Bukowski on Twitter / @peterbukowski@bsky.social on Bluesky / @peter_bukowski on Threads

The Leap: @TheLeapGB on Twitter / The Leap's YouTube channel

MORE: If the Packers' receivers are mid, doesn't that mean Jordan Love and Matt LaFleur rock?

Critics will say the Packers have a bunch of WR2 and WR3s but no WR1s. OK, but they were an elite offense last year. So how did that happen?

Discussion about this post